Research & Articles


 

The Voice of the Learner: How Employees Learn in 2008

Employees today are learning how to do their jobs very differently!  e-Learning, on-line Video, Social Networks and other Informal methods are now options for learning, in addition to more traditional Classes and On-The-Job Training (OJT).

A recent survey by The MASIE Center of 6,100 employees in companies around the world provides a profile of how employees currently learn at work and how their learning preferences are changing.

Learning Methods:

  • Learning Independently: The majority of employees today rely heavily on self-directed, ad hoc and asynchronous resources like e-Learning to learn for work.  In a six-month period of time, 70% turned to reading, 58% searched the web and 58% participated in on-line e-Learning to gain new skills or information for their jobs.
  • YouTube-Type Learning:  Over 30% of respondents viewed a media segment for learning (like a YouTube video) on their computer screens; however, only 6% moved these segments to a portable device like an iPod or MP3 Player.  Mostly, employees indicated that such technology was either not available or not used by their organizations.

Employee/Learner Satisfaction:

  • Employees appear satisfied with their ability to learn for work using technology (80%), but are generally less satisfied with the amount of time they have available to learn (48%).  It seems that as options for learning have expanded, perceptions about the availability of time to learn have decreased.  Employees have more learning methods available to them than ever, but have less time to pursue learning and/or feel overwhelmed with their options.

 

Learner Preferences:

  • Learning Changes Ahead: More than half of the employees sampled expect their preferences for how they learn for work to change in the next 2-3 years (54%). 
  • High-Touch with High-Tech: Learners appreciate high-touch experiences and indicated wanting more time to receive one-on-one mentoring, coaching or individual training as opposed to OJT or self-directed, ad hoc learning.  This includes group discussions and the ability to directly interact with others at conferences and in classrooms within their own organizations.  Quite a few learners look forward to or hope to get more one-on-one mentoring, coaching or individual training, despite the reality that employees report about having less time for training.

Job Rotation/Stretch Assignments:

  • Let Us Stretch: Job Rotation/Stretch Assignments are among the least frequently used learning methods selected only by 11% of employees, predominantly because the opportunities were not available to them.  Half of employees that had not participated in a job rotation/stretch assignment indicated that those opportunities were either not available or not used by their organizations; yet, supporting data suggests that employees overwhelmingly want more of their time dedicated to those kinds of experiences. 

 

Some Quotes from the Workplace:

Here are a few of the quotes we received from the survey participants:

 “What I like most about how I am currently learning for work is…”

  • ‘Having a variety of delivery methods.  Ten years ago it was one way or the highway!’
  • ‘The ability to use digital technology for any-time, anywhere learning.'
  • ‘I could plug in my Mp3 player in my car and learn while I wait uselessly in traffic.’
  • ‘Freedom of delivery vehicle - in person, asynchronous, synch/live, anonymous, collaborative...'
  • ’The combination of in-person classes with online reinforcement.’

 
“I would learn better in the future if…”

  • ‘I had more time to devote to specific tasks related to learning and advanced technology.’
  • ‘I experienced more collaboration and discussions vs. reading and learning on my own.’
  • ‘Time were permitted without outside pressure to complete learning.’

 

This survey was conducted by The MASIE Center & The Learning CONSORTIUM.  
To view the complete results, please click the PDF link below.

Voice-of-the-Learner-070708-appendix.pdf :View PDF | Download PDF

 

Language Learning by iPod:  An Emerging Model

by Hank Horkoff and Jonathan M. Kayes

As podcasting becomes ubiquitous in the world of e-learning, it can bring us almost anything from investment tips, to interviews with leading authors some of which are fabulous and others have you reaching for your MP3 player to switch to The Beastie Boys.  Where can you turn for best practices and perhaps even get the added value of being able to better understand a key part of the global environment?  What we've found is a 15 minute, caffeine-like dose of Mandarin Chinese, brought to you by a high-energy team of teachers and voice actors coming to you daily direct from Shanghai, China. In a nutshell, that is what Praxis Language's ChinesePod.com has been doing since September 2005, in the process attracting over a quarter of million students interested in learning Chinese.

What we see in these podcasts are some best practices - using social web tools to enhance online language learning and innovative approaches to utilizing podcasting for educational goals.  While language learning has been around as long as human beings have spoken more than one tongue, the model here is uniquely designed for the Web 2.0 world. Static lesson content is transformed into 'lesson events' by focusing student attention around specific content and encouraging student involvement to further enhance the originally designed lesson.  Podcasts, with their conversational nature, rapid publication cycle and modular architecture can further transform learning into an engaging, fresh and personalized experience. This actually takes steps into Learner 2.0 where the learner changes their experiences and behaviors through a collaborative process as they interact with the content, other users, and the instructors.

In addition to taking advantage of new technologies, ChinesePod has changed Chinese-language instruction by adopting many English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching techniques and applying them to Chinese. Rather than teaching adults as Chinese children would be taught, the emphasis is on the relevant and practical. Lessons on how to order a cold beer, or hearing Godzilla attacking Shanghai narrated by a small band of enthusiastic teachers and voice actors, all delivered by RSS feed with accompanying texts, is simply a fresh approach to teaching Chinese. Over thirty years ago one of the co-authors took his first foray into learning Chinese.  Armed with a library card, he found a textbook and accompanying LP records and tried to learn some of the language during the summer before starting college.  Trying to mimic the sounds and the four tones of Mandarin Chinese on his stereo seemed like a good idea, but it simply didn't work and certainly did not hold his interest.  In the ensuing years technology supporting language learning did make some improvements.  Language labs at leading schools like Middlebury allowed for taping the student's voice to compare it to how things should really sound, but it was still mostly dry stuff.  Creative approaches to multimedia in the late '70s brought transcripts of several of the great Chinese films of the 1930s and 40s together with the classroom time for watching the films, but it wasn't material you could bring home to review.  CD-ROM programs began to proliferate by the mid-late 1990s, but for Chinese they were either geared to the beginner or were shows from Chinese television aimed at the native speaker.

The podcasting approach was born out of the experiences of the average English language student in Shanghai where one often spends more time traveling to and from class than actually sitting in the classroom! If you break down the typical language class into stages of lesson input, lesson review, practice/feedback and reinforcement, one can start to see where technology might be best applied and where valuable classroom time should be focused. If a student could listen to a lesson podcast during the day, review key vocabulary and grammar online on their own, and only then meet face-to-face with a teacher, not only would they be better prepared for class, but they could also maximize the opportunity to apply what they had learned on their own.  This is in itself an approach which uses the best in adult learning theory.

The development and production team for the programs also listened to their growing customer base. Students said "We don't want inconvenient classes, out-of-date lessons, boring teachers or any other impediments that makes learning a foreign language harder than it already is."  You can beat that constraint by answering a couple of simple questions:  Instead of designing a training service around the resource constraints of an educational institution, why not design it around the needs of a student - what they want, when they want it, where they want it and on the device they want?

What does that look like in practice?  Let's look at three areas: the lessons themselves, the importance of using Web 2.0 social networking tools, and helping teachers use this new type of learning material in their classrooms.

The Podcasts
The consistent approach has been to break down the walls of a classroom and find the largest possible audience for great teachers.  Each Chinese podcast uses a conversational, radio-show style.  They are new, modern, hip, and funny. The listener is immediately engaged by the enthusiastically mellifluous voice of co-host Jenny Zhu who is present in every lesson from 'newbie' through advanced.  Jenny, a Shanghai native in her mid-20s, studied in Singapore and Australia which has given her complementary skills in both Chinese and English.  Irish-accented Ken Carroll, Jenny's fellow instructor at the newbie and beginner levels, has a knack for making language real by giving a variety of English choices for a Chinese phrase so that the listener gets a strong sense of the vibrancy of the language. Even at the beginner level the language is always authentic and has a practical approach.  If you're coming to do business in China, you need to know how to give toasts at a banquet or negotiate a contract.  And you can get those and more at your level of learning.

In the intermediate and upper intermediate lessons, John Pasden joins Jenny.  The 50-50 split of Chinese and English words of the lower level lessons quickly becomes an 80-20 split by upper intermediate which still allows the learner to hear new vocabulary or grammar in English, but tune their ear increasingly to Chinese.  Several voice actors join Jenny and John which enhances the fun and let's the listener hear a greater variety of speakers.  This is another podcast benefit over the traditional classroom where you heard one teacher and perhaps a teaching assistant -- suddenly you've got four to six male and female voices to tune your ear to.  And the lessons at this level revel in the fun which is part of each podcast.  From their own version of "Lost" where some tourists suddenly disappear while touring Jizhou to a lesson featuring the habit of people fighting in order to pay the restaurant bill, as well as cultural forays into Chinese poetry, it is hard not to hear the giggles of the ChinesePod crew as they keep delivering those lessons in spoken Mandarin.  Finally there are the Advanced lessons with little or no English focused on some aspect of Chinese life or conducting business in China where Jenny is joined by another native speaker for truly authentic flavor in the lesson.

Regardless of the learning level, each lesson provides inductive clues to prompt students to figure things out for themselves. This is done by the hosts, the voice actors and through sound effects.  The sheer variety of topics is purposefully aimed to encourage student engagement and this is further enhanced through varied delivery formats and length of the podcast.  On these latter two points, the format can be a simple grammar lesson or the ongoing diary of a college student, the ins and outs of relationships or the latest views of movies in China.  The average podcast is about fifteen minutes but can vary from eleven to eighteen minutes, all well within bounds to avoid listener fatigue.  At all but the advanced level the dialogs are repeated two-three times so the learner can pick up the intended points and hear them several times.  The authenticity of language and of the topics shines through each podcast.

The daily publishing schedule builds anticipation in the listener and allows for contemporary topics to arrive in your MP3 player in 'just-in-time' fashion.  Lessons become events that draw attention, create student involvement, and encourage feedback through user questions, comments and insights which take place on the ChinesePod website - all of which enhance the originally published lesson.  With a new lesson being published every day, there are hundreds of lessons freely accessible putting the archive well on its way to becoming the largest corpus of Chinese learning material available on the Web.

Importance of Social Web Tools
The underlying philosophy of learning inherent in this approach is not about broadcasting from teacher to student, but is instead a series of true interactions between teacher and student, and student to student.  Web 2.0 social web tools help facilitate this social interaction and help engage the student in the learning process. Lesson podcasts provide the spark to the learning experience, which is further fueled by the interactions on the website and engagements between student and teacher regardless of whether they happen online or offline, synchronously or asynchronously.

Social networking services for students help to broaden the in-class experience. Problems with classroom instruction, such as the phenomena of the "sage on the stage" where students are hesitant to consult each other for learning, but instead go through the teacher at the front of the class, can be addressed through more informal and casual leaving of posts & messages on the website. The classroom can play a critical role in the learning process, but can be made even more effective by using technology for tasks such as lesson input, student Q&A and lesson reinforcement.  All of this inculcates a spirit of Learner 2.0 with the learner at the center of a collaborative process.  In a recent experiment to bring additional interactivity into what should not become a staid environment, a segment called "Movie Madness" has appeared every few weeks.  A well known dialog from an English language film is translated into Mandarin, voice acted with appropropriate sound effects, and then put into a podcast.  The podcast teaches the grammar and vocabularly of the scene, but to add to the interactivity, listeners are invited to enter a contest in which they have to identify the original fillm.  Then a winner gets a gift of podcast lessons.  In the more than six months Movie Madness has been out there, over fifty listeners each week participate in the contests. 

 
Integrating Podcasts with the Classroom
The ChinesePod service was originally designed for adult students learning on their own. As the archive grew, teachers in a number of locales started to bring  the learning materials into their classrooms which in turn fueled requests for new features and customizable content. Teachers asked for Amazon.com-like ratings & reviews to help them navigate through the extensive archive and pre-packaged sets of lessons designed to compliment textbooks they were already using in class. Teachers got course management tools to take advantage of the modular nature of podcasts which helped them re-mix individual lessons to meet the specific needs of their classroom. And they asked for a private online discussion area where only they and their students could meet and discuss their lessons. This has become a DIY social network service where the teachers control who can join the group and the level of privacy.  What has taken place has been an incredible evolution from podcasting to an individual student to multiple levels of both formal and informal interactive classes at all levels of language learning.

It will take decades to transition fully from institution-centered to student-centered learning. Inspired by the shift in market power in media economics from producer to consumer, learning media will undergo a similar transition pushing the learning industry to adapt to student needs. ChinesePod is using podcasting and social networking to work towards this goal. The more market-orientated adult education industry will be the first to change, but over time these student-centered changes will filter down to more formal institutional learning.

The Authors:

Hank Horkoff is CEO and co-founder of Praxis Language.  He lives in Shanghai.
Jonathan Kayes is the Chief Learning Officer at the Central Intelligence Agency and has studied Chinese since 1975





 

 

Reflections on the First Three Minutes of Learning

We recently asked readers of Learning TRENDS to comment on the need to design the first 3 minutes of learning more intentionally.  Here is a sample of the more than 100 comments we received: 

“I was a classroom teacher for a total of 23 years and since then have conducted hundreds of workshops and seminars for corporate clients and professional associations. For those about to begin a presentation of any kind, it is imperative to keep the following in mind:
Research studies involving millions of participants reveal that, in face-to-face contact, one's impact is determined as follows:
  • Body Language About 60-65%
  • Tone of Voice 25-20%
  • What Is Actually Said 15% (tops)

During voice-to-voice (e.g. during a telephone conversation) contact:

  • Tone of Voice About 75-80%
  • What Is Actually Said 25% (tops)”

-Bob Morris

“Though I understand the point you're trying to make regarding this subject, I don't think that such stress should be put on those 3 first minutes.  I think that both good teachers and good learners should always make a conscious effort to keep an open mind both about people and ideas. That's the basis of a good learning attitude: not letting prejudice and fast/easy judgment stand in the way, for it will only have you lose what could be a good learning opportunity.
I think that adjusting expectations between the teacher/lecturer and its audience is a key point to starting off "on the right foot", so it should be discussed right from the start. But this depends on the particular situation you're addressing.  In a number of learning scenarios, scope and expectations are very clear from the start for both sides, so it wouldn't make sense going on about it.  In many cases, probably the first 3 minutes won't be so important, apart from the fact that some people try to make too much (of a case) out of too little (information/experience).
Maybe you should promote a discussion on how many times we've made quick judgments only to find out that we were dead wrong.  I know it happened to me a lot of times and probably some of the times I was just too blind to even see it.”
-Pedro Freire, Deptº de Gestão de Aplicações, SUMOLIS, CSP-SI

“Although I've been a classroom trainer for over 30 years, the last 8 have been online and I have to say...the first 3 minutes are even MORE important online. I always, always, always start my first 3 minutes with an interactive activity. Things like having the students point to a map of where they are or collaborate on something on a whiteboard. I want everyone to know right up front that this is a collaborative interactive session and not a time they can sit though and check their emails!”
-Linda Uli, Cisco Systems

“I design primarily e-Learning where people seem to quickly turn off to the learning. One way I attempt to keep them engaged is by posing a thought provoking question. Soon thereafter, I attempt to provide a solution that is feasible, but I then contradict it and say things like ‘what if’ or ‘however.’  Then I question how it relates to the specific learning topic.  I try to use this initial thought provoking question as a reference and example throughout the training/learning in an effort to tie the topic into a real world application and to the job.
I am interested to see what other have to say for their 3 minutes. I know I have tuned out after just 60 seconds of an online page turner.”
-Kevin Haley, Travelers - Hartford

“My business partner and I want the very first second the participant enters the room to begin to stimulate and intrigue. To that end, we use lots of vibrant colors in the room set-up for instant stimulation (e.g., table cloths, table tents, posters with lots of color, a resource table overflowing with materials and tools to touch and feel). We use table toys, learning placemats that are linked to the topic and are in coloring book format. We also place a bright container with markers in it so they can color their placemats during the presentation. We don't force seating (feels too rigid).  We might move people later, or have some sort of sorting method in place (we did a baseball theme for one class).  To break up potential cliques, we gave people tickets to the ‘game’ as they came in.  Each table had a different seating section--bleachers, green monster, box seats, etc. We have music playing as people enter, and often have a game in progress as people arrive (e.g., bingo). Tables, preferably round ones, are set up  independently...no school room or business meeting formats. One of us meets participants at the door and introduces ourselves as they enter while the other works the room getting people settled, answering questions, and making sure things are in order. That is all before the official start of class. In the actual 'called to order' first 3 minutes, we tell them that we are not there to teach them anything, they are there to discover for themselves.  There will be no test, and that their level of participation is up to them.  We know they don't have to look at us to pay attention so they should feel free to play with table toys, color the placemats, stand or sit as they please and to just be respectful of their classmates.”
-Kathie Sucidlo, LL. Bean

“Here’s what my colleagues and I do in the first three minutes: After welcoming everyone, we say something like:
‘I don’t have to tell you that X days is a lot of your time and money (or your organization’s money). If I were you, I’d be thinking that this had better be really good. So we’d like to start by asking each of you a few questions:

  1. Your name, your role
  2. How you are feeling about being here
  3. What needs to happen for your time to be well spent

We’ll capture your answers to the last question on flipchart paper and post them so we can check to see how we’re doing in terms of meeting your needs. Who would like to go first?’ Key principles: be transparent about the focus on the learner and their likely mindset, then ask for their needs with genuine curiosity.”
-Matt Beane, Roger Schwarz & Associates


“As learners enter, play music that is applicable to the lesson with quotes or interesting ‘sayings’ on the walls.  Begin not with introducing yourself, but with a story that keeps them interested for the first 3 minutes.  The story must be tied into the course goals and to the information on the walls and to the song.”
-Sharon V. Leynes

“I start my classes with something different or unexpected. I did a session on Positive Psychology and started with a poem titled, “I Know Something Good About You” by Louis C. Shimon. It was an unexpected yet related way to begin learning about the topic.
I have started science lessons by reading stories, short picture books that allow the learner to begin thinking about the content in a non-threatening and welcoming manner. For example, “June 29, 1999” is a story about giant vegetables and fruits that mysteriously float down to earth from the sky.  It is through this fun, little book that we begin learning about and studying vegetable plants and what they need to grow.
In still other situations, I ask people to write down three reasons for being here, and I share mine. Usually we find that our reasons are similar but how we plan to apply what we learn is as varied and original as the individuals in the class.
In subjects such as math, science, legal or HR issues (where people tend to be bored, scared, afraid, or anxious) I try to help put them at ease by using humor, enabling a small success for each individual, or even asking them to describe their experiences with the subject prior to our gathering. I have also used “free-association” when it seemed appropriate. “
-Michael Vitali, FedEx Express

“Too often we experience facilitators first talking about themselves and about details of the class. Rather, the first few minutes are more effectively used in better understanding and appreciating the learners and their needs.  I like to begin by asking open-ended questions about them; their experience with the topic; what they need from the class; how they can contribute to the subject matter.”
-Laura Mankowski, Mercury Insurance

“Don't wait for the 1st minute to begin.  Having posters, words, or pictures (for example) on the wall that hit some of the relevant points set the mood for the learning.  Also make sure the room is conducive to learning.  Ensure the right temperature, lighting, seating arrangements are used.”
-William Kelly, J.J. Keller & Associates, Inc.

“Good, clear communication basics don’t change: tell them what you’re going to tell them, tell them, tell them what you told them (William Safire, “Lend Me Your Ears: Great Speeches in History, 1997, W.W. Norton & Company, p. 21, www.wwnorton.com, ISBN 0-393-04005-4). 
In the first three minutes you should be working of the overview (who, what, when, where, why, how) with enthusiasm…enthusiasm and organization seem to be the strong recurring themes students comment on as I review hundreds of faculty evaluations.  Paint the big picture…show them the puzzle box top and how big/how many pieces there are…be fascinated…be the tour guide!  Tell them how your class is going to improve their life.”
-Stephen S. Davis, Ph.D., USAF Maj (Ret), Ohio U College of Osteopathic Medicine

“I agree that the 3 minutes are the most powerful. That is why I believe in POSITIONING in the 3 minutes and changing the game from being an instructor to a listener and engaging the audience to understand their position on the topic.
Their ‘already existing listening’ is what an instructor is competing with! Listening to their already existing listening and hearing what and where they stand on the issue, tells me about the energy in the room, the mood and how to move next.”
-Mohamad S Kasti, MS, MBB, MCA, Center for Transformation & Innovation (CTI)

“I *always* make sure the class has an ‘ah-ha’ moment before the introductions, before the icebreaker, and of course well before the lecture, where they get to see a powerful example of what skills they are going to learn - so that they realize there was an important, life-changing reason they came to the workshop.
When teaching customer skills, I ask people what to say to someone whose car they just towed away, and challenge them to come up with only statements that *benefit* the tow-ee. After a lot of hemming and hawing and squirming in their seats, they usually come up with great answers – ‘Your car is in a safe place.’ ‘I know where your car is."’ ‘I can help you get your car back.’ ‘I get frustrated when this happens to me, so I know how you feel.’ - and when I then show them the mechanics of how simple psychology can defuse *any* situation they face, they are hooked for the rest of the class.
Similarly, with my program on painless feedback, I get people talking about what to say to an angry employee who goes off on a customer.  When they see there is a teachable process to suck all the heat out of, even the most difficult discussions, they are hooked.
This is particularly critical in e-Learning, where there is a tendency to cover step 1, step 1a, step 1b, etc. before ever getting to the ‘meat’. Give them a free sample of the most powerful things they will learn first, before you do *anything* else, and they are yours for the rest of the program.
One other thing I am doing up front nowadays is using funny stories to drive points home. For example, my latest book "What to Say to a Porcupine" uses 20 humorous stories based on Aesop's fables to teach specific customer skills - and guess what, I am finding that people read and retain this advice much better than they did from my big, thick books on the same subject.”
-Rich Gallagher, Point of Contact Group

“I am surprised by how many trainers don't introduce themselves or even acknowledge people as they walk into a classroom. This may have a negative effect on the learner before the class even starts.”
-Dallas Tye, CSC

“So no matter how good your content is, your 3 minutes may already be up!
I see that some trainers are busy still setting up, and this may also send the wrong message to learners. (hey, he's not prepared,  I wonder what his material is like?)
This note about the first 3 minutes caused a flurry of conversation in my group!  One tip that we came up with is that it is important to start on time.  We teach technical all day live virtual classroom training (i.e., with Elluminate).  We have a support person in every class to help the stragglers get in or those with technical difficulties, and the instructor starts on time.  We even use a count-down timer so that all students know exactly when we're starting.  Because we start with activities for introductions, by the time the stragglers join they won't have missed any technical content.
My group also talked about how the logistics of enrolling and joining the virtual class are part of those first 3 minutes and it's important that it's easy and straight forward. We had a debate about when do the 3 minutes start.  We've been evolving these processes over the last year or so to fix all the ragged edges.”
-Linda Flanders, IBM UNIX Software Support Education

“Our propensity (readiness or perceived need) to make instant decisions is not limited to formal learning, it, in my view, applies to all of our interactions with people places and things - anything new.
Indeed the research establishes that our brain is apparently so oriented to the way things are (steady on the same course) that it often/nearly always interprets new as error!
It seems to be like an immune system rejecting anything "foreign" as "potential danger".
Yes of course we make our minds up in 3 minutes (7 seconds some people say - is the life span of a brochure - interesting? Or it goes in the bin) because we actually don't use our mind at all.  We are not assessing evidence, we are deciding (without evidence) whether this new thing/person/course 'fits' and might be useful.
There is more but that was my 3 minutes worth.”
-John Loty, AI Advocate and Facilitator

“It is vital to establish the tone and to underscore the theme for your session.  It doesn’t hurt to start singing our song loud and clear at the beginning of class.  
For this particular situation, I am starting with a quote that contains a key word for our objectives.  I may even repeat the quote and invite them to write it down.
Other elements I view as important are inviting the participants to share examples, questions, or comments to get them invested in the class and explaining to them what they can expect – including my role as their facilitator.
I used to wing this but am discovering that it is safer to actually write a “cheat sheet” so that I won’t forget any of these steps.”
-Anna Watkins, Mesa Mental Health/Corporate Health Resources

“Here's what I'd like to see us ideally doing in the e-Learning world to improve that first look experience:

  • Spend less time (and space) on flashy titles and branding. If your employees don't know where they work, you have bigger issues.
  • Loose the "Learning objectives" bullet points. We should be engaging our learners with a storyline or an experience that makes it clear why they are here. "Measurable Objective Statements" are for the designers, not the learners.
  • Make it clear to the learner what they are responsible for learning and let them do it. If this means allowing them to skip to a summary and take the test, so be it. It may not be pretty, but it's reality.
  • Make links to other learning resources available from the beginning. Why should this course be the only source of information?”

-Erik Jaros, Chase Card Services, Performance Improvement

“The pre-learning time spent properly will help prepare for an effective first three minutes:

  1. Before the presentation, understand the level of knowledge of the learners. Prepare for a range of minimum knowledge to expert.
  2. Where appropriate involve the expert learners during your presentation.
  3. Understand the age range of the learners keeping in mind that “Millennials” want context and meaning, make it fun. Boomers may want to be led to the information.”

-Paul, Paul W. Bartlett, Inc

“In e-Learning training, I like to set the situation...put them in the mindset of a particular problem or place that will help them remember why they need to pay attention.  I'd say this would apply as well with instructor-led, but I develop much less of this.”
-Mina P. Busch, M.Ed, Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center

“In the first minutes of a software class I ask students their names and what they have come to learn, filling in a simple diagram so I can call them by name when they have their hands up.  As each student says what their goal is I say ‘Yes, we are covering that’, or, ‘that is something special that I can show you during a break’, so that they know I take their learning goals seriously.
-Liz Scott

“Describe two benefits that will accrue to the participant from using one or ywo of the ideas to be presented. Describe how the participant will feel during and after their use of one or two of these ideas.”
-Don Thoren, CPAE Speaker Hall of Fame

“Interesting stuff, but please notice for those of us who have been actually educated in the learning business, that this type of information has been available for at least 40 years.  This might be an “ah-ha’ for those who arrived to the business with no formation on it.
Some of the wonderful research conducted in the 40's - 50's in the USA, as an example, gave us most of what people seem to be so mesmerized today about. Some times I wish there were standards to enter this profession of us and standards for universities to qualify their graduates in the ‘learning and training’ business.
I'm writing because I concur with your efforts and contribution; to that end, I suspect it is important to provide a bit of history/context for knowledge that seems to be new but it is only in the minds of those who haven't learn before/don’t know the achievements of their field”
-Luis C. Moreno , Change Architects Incorporated

“I learned a critical rule in my screenplay writing class many years ago: you have to hook your audience within the first 3-5 minutes.
In that time, you need to set the tone of the film and introduce at least two of the following elements: supporting characters (directly or indirectly involved with the protagonist or antagonist); the protagonist or the antagonist and his/her/its motivation, the primary conflict, or the genesis of the primary conflict.
Engaging and effective e-Learning adheres to a variation of this screen-writing 101 rule. Set the tone of the training via design aesthetics and functionality as determined by whether the event designed to inform, build a skill or competency, or certify; introduce the learner's role and motivation; efficiently recount the opportunity/problem for which the event is designed and associated situations. All of this can easily be done within the first three minutes of any module using a story (and in the some cases, the remaining of the training event could be a story, too).”
-Robert G. Flores, Strategic Learning Services, Edward Jones



“The instructor above all else has to convey to the class he/she is excited to be there.  The students have to see and hear the instructor’s excitement.  The instructor does this with his voice inflection, making eye contact with various students, strong body language, and smiling.
Another tactic the instructor should use is to go around the room while students arrive, shake the student’s hand, introduce himself and ask a question that requires the student to give some kind of personal information of themselves.  Immediately I have conveyed to the student he is welcomed into my classroom and more importantly, the student and instructor have created a small bond with each other.”
-Philip D. Crowder, Travelers Claim University

“E-Learning- the opening screen of the course should be simple, error-free, welcoming, and the first steps the students need to take should be readily apparent ... navigating the course should not look overwhelming, complicated, complex, difficult etc as, in our experience, this takes the students focus away from learning and increases stress levels while simultaneously decreasing problem-solving abilities. A clean, clear, inviting screen can increase motivation while the opposite situation will lower student motivation and interest.”

-Karen Quinney, Loyalist College

“Set the scene in anticipation: - Who are they? In what Context? Why they need me?
Give a minute about yourself to them: show your passion and your love.
Give a minute to the objectives: tell a story or an example.
Give a minute to them: show that you made your ‘homework’ about knowing them.”
-Etelberto


Since a good percentage of e-Learning is mandatory I am interested in knowing
the effect on this group if the first 180 seconds receives a "thumbs down." Is
this then a total loss of not only the investment by the organizations, but also
a complete waste of the participant’s time?”
-Jacqueline Hendrick, The Hendrick Group

“An engaging story--classroom or eLearning, that serves to motivate and let the learner know why this is the best thing to do with their next 10, 20, 30 minutes!
Thank you for these valuable insights.  I'm anxious to hear the ‘reboot’ story responses because in a few months I'll be in the scary, interesting and exciting position of rebuilding a learning/training/development dept from scratch!  As you can imagine, the real estate industry has/is making incredible leaps of change and we'll have the opportunity to imagine and build something new for our company's agents and leadership.”
-Linnea A. Jacobs, GMAC Home Services Director of Training

 

Geeks on Tour visit Saratoga Springs.

Chris & Jim Guld, owners of Geeks on Tour, a roving RV providing computer training and support to RV'ers, visit Saratoga Springs on July 31, 2008.  Check out their website: http://www.geeksontour.com

 

 

Should People Leave a Class Early?

On June 14, 2007, we asked Learning TRENDS readers, "If you are teaching a class and some of the people in the course "get it" after a few hours, can they leave? In other words, if they are quick and contextual learners and master the content rapidly, can they leave or do they need to stay until the end of the course?"  Here is a compilation of several responses we received!

 “If delegates would only learn from the facilitator (coach / trainer) then when they get it, they can leave and more quality time is spent on the ones who need further assistance. But in most sessions, the learning is coming from facilitator and fellow learners. The ones 'who get it' can assist in transferring their learning and providing peer coaching (they mostly know more about the application and company specific context then 'external' consultant.

I remember a comment from an MBA student years ago to a fellow student who did not attend or left early on sessions (as he 'got it'). The MBA student said he chose and paid lots of money for this MBA and took a year of work to learn from professors and fellow students (their experience and knowledge). His fellow students were part of the learning and therefore he demanded them to be there.” Hans van der Linden, TMA Ltd.

 “I totally agree with the concept of allowing students to indicate when they wish to demonstrate mastery and then be allowed to leave.  Far too much time in educational institutions is wasted by enforcing attendance rather than ensuring learning. In Asia, attendance taking takes far too much precedence.  However, this is all fine if we are talking about some kind of practical skill. If the session requires collaboration and input from all team members, then it is not appropriate for some to leave early.  When it comes to well-designed technologically enhanced learning, why does the student have to be there physically at all?” Murray Stuart Bourne, Ngee Anne Polytechnic

“If I spotted a trend of students leaving training early after demonstrating mastery of the content, I'd be at our next executive committee meeting to claim victory on both the cost savings and increased productivity fronts. If your Israeli colleagues have found a scalable and repeatable way to do this, please put me in touch with them. Hopefully this e-conversation will prompt more of us to experiment with new learning models and to revisit the relevance of some of the instructional design models that have remained mostly unchanged for decades.” Michael Glazer, Burson-Marsteller University

“Sometimes people think they "get it" early in a class, but as the class progresses there maybe tidbits of information they can still learn.  Also, it is beneficial for the other learners to benefit from their experience/knowledge if shared during discussions or question and answer sessions. Due to their understanding concepts earlier or previous experience, they tend to ask more meaningful questions and the other learners can benefit from this. I think it is a plus to all for all participants to remain for the duration.” Lee Rahr, Kimberly Clark 

 “In order for learners to "peel off", all the content/concepts would have to be covered. Typically, course design - especially ILT - is not prescriptive. There would have to be opportunities provided to have participants "test out" on the subject matter. It would necessitate re-thinking how we design programs, but the concept is an interesting one and would make better use of resources.” Evelyn Townsend, GoTransGlobe

 “I think that allowing those who have already mastered the content to leave early makes perfect sense.  The global mindset is conservation and efficiency in general, and I say why not apply that with respect to the time commitment of learners. If I can master the subject half way through a two week course, let me return to my job and apply it productively rather than lose that productive forever.  Then there is the problem of continuing professional education requirements that assign CPE or CPU credits based on a 50-minute "contact" hour. If I master the material in some fraction of that 50-minute hour, I only receive credit for each full unit of contact time completed. It's a disincentive for me to leave early.  But I suppose CPE hours have less to do with mastery than they do with checking a box to satisfy professional requirements for "contact". Sigh…if only contact equaled proficiency.” Jeff Martin, Interactive & Learning Solutions

 “The Army option is a sound strategy, and one that we as a TAFE ( Australia), or in the USA, a Community College delivering Trade Qualifications adopt.  However, there can be a greater benefit to the class if the person that "gets it" stays on.  This is via their valued input into class discussion and the opportunity for learners to learn from a peer, "who already gets it".

  • An alternative explanation from the students’ perspective
  • An alternative explanation from a generational perspective
  • A collaborative environment promoting teamwork and camaraderie. linking closely with life in the real workplace

Yes they do have options, but the benefits of staying, and helping far outweighs leaving.” Rodger Carroll, Chisholm Institute

“If education and or training are truly learner centered then it's hard to argue that when the learner feels they have got what they wanted or needed from the experience that they should stay the distance. To what extent is this about reporting and funding issues?

In a similar vein, here in New Zealand, we've an ongoing debate about state funding for courses being tied to completion rates. One of the arguments that keeps cropping up is what happens when a learner leaves, say a welding course, because they have landed themselves a job as a welder. Has the learner failed? or is getting a job as a welder a successful outcome. In terms of the funding regime, this may be regarded as a failure to complete, but from the learner's point of view, they achieved what they needed to and got the job, presumably, they were training for.” Keith Tyler-Smith, Christchurch Polytechnic of Technology

“Working with elementary and secondary schools can you imagine the impact this could have on education?  Students who "get it" don't have to sit through an entire year of a class, but rather can test/project out or demonstrate expertise in another way and move on to more challenging subjects.  It would also provide what our schools desperately need - more time for those children who truly need it.  Add in technology and we could actually find the schools in this nation preparing children for life.” Carol Geddis, Catholic Schools Administrators Association of New York

“If I want my training to be learner-centered, then I want the learners to be making the best use of their time. That may mean (as my ego takes a humbling gulp) that NOT being there for the duration makes the most sense for some. If mastery of the content is performance based and can be measured, then there is even the option that they need not attend any of the training if they can demonstrate mastery prior to the event. If we allow that, then we certainly need to allow early departures upon demonstrated mastery.

It's about the learners and meeting their needs - not about me pontificating or thinking their life is somehow incomplete because they weren't in my presence as long as others.” Jeff Ross, Humana Inc.

“Learners take more and more responsibility for their own learning. And therefore should be more and more be free to adjust to their learning style. And therefore free to leave a course after a few hours. The reason to doubt the effectiveness of the training when learners do so, in my opinion, is:

  • Rumor while leaving
  • Keeping on eye on the true reasons of leaving (does he really master the content?)
  • Learners who stay in the classroom can get insecure of their knowledge en capabilities compared to the "leavers"

So I wonder if the instructor can get more effectively on those needing coaching.

But essentially I adapt the principal study-"just enough". Society is getting more and more individual, which is not a negative thing, so the way you learn most effectively should be adjustable to this individual "just enough, just in time" principal.” Nandy hos, PAT Learning Solutions

“This idea recently came up in an e-learning demo I sat through. This particular e-learning vendor had some great design concepts, and one of them was this customized learning path.  Each online course included a pre-test and, as a customer, I can set the mastery level for the pre-tests at whatever I want; I think the default was 70%. Depending on which questions on the pre-test I get right or wrong, I can "test out" of portions of the course. Of course, the online course was developed in a modular fashion without dependencies. In this way, a learner can "test out " of sections and a customized learning path is built. I think this is great! And when you get right down to it, what difference would it make what the delivery mode is--for me, in an ideal environment no learner should be expected to sit through content they have mastered. I think this is where we, in the learning industry, cause great frustration with learners. When we deliver content that is rote based on their current level of knowledge and expect them to bear through it because others in the class need it. We justify it by saying the "review" can only help. No, the "review" can really just insult learners. We need to get away from this--we need to find inventive ways to make every experience fit every learner.  This just seems like a way to do this.  Of course, it is dependent on the content. If the course includes some practice or skill building in areas that "one can always improve"--public speaking, communications, probably mostly softer skills, then maybe it makes sense to have the learner stay and complete that kind of ongoing practice.” Angela Athy, Union Pacific Railroad

“I've often "left" class early, but only for online learning.  We often receive e-mails about required courses we must take at IBM.  Some of these courses are 4 - 8 hour e-learning events, and with our high utilization goals, we end up having to take this training at night.  What I often do is immediately take the associated exam to see how much I know off the cuff.  Then, based on my score, I decide which modules to review.  I then take the exam again and generally pass, saving myself several hours of time.   I honestly haven't ever left a stand-up ILT class early, outside of when they give you four hours to take the exam, and you finish it in one.  I guess my fear in leaving early would be that maybe even though I "think" I get it for the upcoming lessons, do I know for sure the instructor isn't going to share some interesting nugget of info that would help me?  To be honest, being able to take a "real live" class these days is such a privilege that I don't know that I'd want to leave early.  IBM is so focused on profit that they overlook employee development (oh, they'll tell you differently, but it's true).” Bronson Beisel, IBM Application Services

“As a learner, I have been on both sides of the coin:  I’ve been one of the last in the class to “get it”, and I’ve also been one of the first in the class to master the concept.  I can see both sides of this argument.  But I will say that there is a lot to be gleaned from those who “get it” by those who don’t.  I’ve picked up a lot of great tips, tricks, and extra information from conversing with those in the classroom – things that the facilitator may never have experienced or encountered.  Similar to your Learning 200X conferences, much of the knowledge is gained – not from the keynote speakers (as interesting and exciting as they all are) and facilitators, but – from chatting and conversing with others in attendance, who share first-hand, “recent” experiences.  In conclusion, my vote would be for the quick learners to try to stay (for a little while) so they can pass their knowledge and understanding to the others in the group who may need the extra time.” Judy McDonough, Constant Contact

 “I’d first say that “peeling off early” is dependent on the individual training session and goals.  Certain topics – perhaps those more “technical” in nature? – might lend themselves to this outcome.  However, in a classroom/roundtable setting I am not in favor of participants leaving for a couple of reasons.

  • They could be utilized to “assist” those who are not grasping the material as quickly.
  • It disrupts the room.  Other participants then get distracted – may feel stronger pressure to perform which can lead to higher stress and a further cycle of distraction.
  • It has the potential for people to “rush” through tasks/discussions/assignments etc.

In a school setting I liken it to the end of any class where students think the class is over and start bundling up to leave.  The professor may have formally concluded the lecture but still has a few informal comments to make…but no one hears those because they are too busy filling their backpacks, checking their IM, etc.” Murray Moman, Agricore United

“In my storage networking training business, I teach technical classes all the time.  My assessment is that the student is always making informed or uninformed choices about the relevancy of a training class "as we go". They have every right to assess and act on those assessments.  If they think they "got it" up to that point it is fine.  I do not even think a "mastery test" is needed at that point.  People know if they got it or not.  The question is "what is left? And what may be missed?"  They can even look ahead in terms of the remaining portion of a class training materials and come to an opinion as to whether investing more of their time in completing the class is a wise personal investment in time or not.  From a practical financial point of view they won't get a refund so that does not enter into the equation.  The thing is that those choices have an inherent risk for the learner.  Without completing the class, even with the opportunity to take a mastery test, they should be missing the additional context information the instructor should be providing as an added value for the remaining information.  Without investing the time in completing the class, that context information would be missed.  That aspect is often overlooked.  So, I encourage students who want to make those "leave early" assessments to make them.  But I encourage them to stay, to add value through discussion for others and continue their role as learning enablers for everyone else's sake.  If I am doing my job, there are things they will pick up through those contextual discussions and at the very least they can act as in class mentors for others.  Bottom line is however every student’s needs to and should balance the remaining learning opportunities with other needs or choices.  By all means go if you wish to or need to make that choice.” Howard Goldstein, Howard Goldstein Associates, Inc.

“I'm all for it.  As a participant, I really do "check out" once I've mastered the content, and inevitably start doing other things even if I'm in the class (i.e. balancing my checkbook, checking email, web-surfing, other work). As a facilitator, one way to attempt to stop this is to string out the key content and mastery activities so that the participants must stay to actually "get it."  But to me this is torture!” Teresa Davenport, Davenport Design & Development

“Having a learner leave after Lesson 1 or 2 and say they 'got it' doesn't certify them for the overall learning objectives or performance based objectives identified by the business. For example, if the course is a negotiating course, and each module during the 2 day course touches on a different skill, if the learner leaves after the first few lessons, how will the organization know that learner mastered all the skills required for negotiation?

For a learner to leave after a lesson that would only be feasible if that lesson was self contained. For example, if it was a course that taught different billing or inventory systems, and the learner only needed to learn one or two of the systems, it would be reasonable to have that learner take those lessons and 'test out' at the end of those modules to validate the knowledge.  The learner, when committing to the training course, or program, signs up for the entire program. In the example below, where the learner felt they 'knew' the material and didn't need to stay, the facilitator should use the learner as a SME and have them support the training program, but participating in the role plays, help other learners if exercises are giving or activities where the SME can then provide feedback. Use the learner to 'show' they mastered the training by having them partner in the training experience.” Debbie Dragone, IBM Business Transformation

 

“It can happen, but only rarely.  I was once let off a course early.  I had been teaching a section of stuff for years, but did not have the required basic qualification.  So I was required to attend a 1-week course. When I arrived, I found that the instructor was a former student, to whom I had actually taught this stuff!  So, he asked me to stay for the first morning, during which time I quickly completed all the worksheets, and then I returned on the last afternoon to take the skills assessment.  He had all his records up to date, and I had a week to devote to my real work.

Most times, though, a course builds up as it progresses, so even if students get the early stuff, there's no knowing that they will get the later, more complex, stuff.  You might want to set a pre-assessment or even mid-course assessment, with an advanced section.  And if they get above a particular score for that advanced section, then they may leave.  If they don't, they have demonstrated that they don't actually "get it" all, so have to stay - it certainly cuts down on the complaining.” Ken Masters, University of Cape Town

 

“In most of our workshops, as well as much of the custom training we develop for clients, I am accustomed to seeing participants leave and go back to work when they have mastered the skills they came to learn, so my reaction to your article was "but, of course!" I loved your phrase, "people 'peeling off' a class as they master the content."  It provides a great visual image of active learning and going forth with new skills and knowledge. 

Bob Mager's Criterion-Referenced Instruction methodology allows instruction to be developed that is learner centered (rather than instructor focused) and self-paced (rather than group paced or time bound).  With the CRI approach, the performance criteria or standards that each learner needs to meet are spelled out up front (in the objectives) and measured as the instruction proceeds (in the skill checks).  The learning program can be designed to allow learners the freedom to select learning activities and sequence (within certain guidelines), to practice as much as they need to, and to take skill checks whenever they feel ready. Once they have mastered all the skills, as evidenced by performance on the skill checks (which mirror as closely as possible actual job performance), they are deemed competent and are free to return to work, or to go on to an activity of their choosing. 

Learners absolutely love this way of learning-the flexibility and freedom, the responsibility for controlling their own learning, the one-on-one coaching tailored directly to their needs instructors can provide, the lack of time wasted on things learners already know, the ability to spend extra time where they need it without the pressure of feeling they are holding the class back, just to name a few of the things participants tell us.  So, in response to your question, "Can people leave a class early?" my answer is a resounding YES if the instruction is designed to allow for that while ensuring competent performance.” Ann Parkman, CEP, The Center for Effective Performance

 

“I think this is an issue that needs to be handled on a case by case scenario.  While the example given of the army "master-class" is an option, it would also be easy to argue that people leaving a session early can serve as a negative reinforcement to the remaining learners and possibly make them feel "dumb" because they are not getting it as quick as the others.

Besides in some cases having some of the quicker learners stay can sometimes encourage peer discussion/learning that can help the entire group in their development and team building capacity.  So, my answer is - in some cases it may be appropriate to let quicker learners leave but in others it may not - it should be a call by the (hopefully) qualified deliverer given the type of training that is occurring.” Paul Langenberg, Brisbane City Counsel

 

“Having to work with a cross section of I/S and non-I/S folks, I think the issue becomes two-fold.  First, aren't there direct costs associated with training? While I can appreciate folks that "get it", what message does this send to other individuals that were bumped or waitlisted? 

The other issue becomes why these individuals feel compelled to attend a full or multiple day class, when they only need training on one or two topics.  Shouldn't they look towards online learning or abbreviated workshops that target specific needs?” Ellen Weinstein, Carnival Cruise Lines

 

 “In principle I am all for it, I usually argue a similar case when some adult learners take longer to learn than younger or more educated classmates.

But I remember the situation of people peeling off class when I was a boy or teenager.

If I was one of those staying longer it stressed me. Because I felt that I was loosing out, or I wasn’t smart enough! So I couldn’t enjoy the benefits.

I think it is important to create context, methods, attitudes and organization which reduce the stigma of being one of those who "always takes longer".  This might help some to benefit from the personal attention they get when few participants are left.” Hróbjartur Árnason, Iceland University of Education

 

 

“The answer to the question is both content- and context-based.  There are arguments for when peeling-off is not appropriate.  For example, I am a student in an online PhD program in organizational psychology.  My coursework consists 12 week asynchronous classes. As a seasoned OD practitioner, I could easily complete much of the coursework in less than 12 weeks but part of the instructional approach includes interaction between students.  I can't peel off because I have to respond to other students' work and let them respond to mine.  In many cases, I have to engage in asynchronous dialog with classmates or instructors.  In this case, peeling off would detract from the learning experience.  I agree with allowing a student to drop out if ongoing interaction is not a necessary feature of the learning model, but in some cases interaction is necessary and peeling off would not be appropriate.” Jay Spitulnik, Lifespan Learning Institute

 

 “In my opinion, the difference between using one-on-one technology to learn and being in a live class to learn is that you not only learn to master the content but you learn from others. So the learning is not just from the content but also the interaction with others and how they learn.  If you are going to be a leader you will understand that not everyone can learn at the same speed so is learning just mastering the content or is it boarder?  If the live class is just lecture and there is little interaction then leaving may be okay but then in that case why go to the live class at all. Just read the book and take the test showing that you mastered the content.” Kayla Briggs , AICPA

 

 “Personally, I would like to see the folks who “get it” stay in the classroom until completion so that others in the class can benefit from their new found knowledge. As we all know, adult learners all gain knowledge differently and it might be that one individual who will learn from a colleague who catches on a bit more quickly than the rest.

Then again, for those who do “get it” earlier in the course can regain that scheduled training time to move on to other lessons or get back to the job at hand a little sooner than expected. This question and subsequent responses are a double edged sword.” Craig Trask, Roche Technical Support Center

 

 “Having people "peel off" a class makes great sense in terms of time and money.

It is a way of allowing people in a classroom to do something that is allowed in some e-learning courses. (I am thinking of courses where I can test out at any time.)

You may hit a snag, though, where there are regulatory requirements which may include "seat time." This could also be an issue for people who are claiming continuing education credit for a class, as their accrediting body likely (in my experience) wants a report of hours in a classroom.” Jennifer Juday, Baxter

 

 “Your question is related, of course, to the instructional design of the course.  If people can master the material early it implies that they either knew the material before the course (in which case they could have tested out to start with) or the course design covers all the learning objectives at the start and uses the rest of the class to elaborate on the content (different than offering an advanced organizer, which gives context but not content.)

The courses I teach have lessons that build, introducing new concepts each time that build on previous learning.   How could a student master quadratic equations because they'd mastered 1st degree equations?  How could a student master the geometry of cones because they knew the geometry of circles? I can see how a programming student who knows how to use help effectively could program the final assignment even though they hadn't learned each construct because they knew how to learn on their own using the help function.

It would help if you gave us an example of objectives that could be taught in the way you suggest. I can't for example, picture a soldier leaving basic training early (and perhaps not having to go through live fire exercises.)” Susan Leslie, SBC Global

 

“1) You have to have a way for persons to prove mastery during the class and not just at the end of the class. It's obvious and easy if it is an online class, but doing it in ILT is a challenge. Here is some sub thoughts:
*          How does the learner get the content ahead of time without disrupting the class?
*          If we are talking knowledge content, and the learner already knew it, why are they taking the class
*          If we are talking skill content, and the class time is being spend on mastery of the skill, then it seems easier to me. I think this is what is happening in the Army example -- they've mastered shooting the gun, and the others haven't.
2) You have to have clear-cut learning objectives with good criterion. If you have that, you can provide assessments based on the objectives, and the learner can take them at any time.
This topic also points to the need for pre-testing. Why not a pretest for an ILT class, then based on the pre-test scores the learner only comes to the sessions they need?” Bruce Maples, Humana Inc.

 

 “I am in agreement with the school of thought permitting early dismissal.  Having experienced this first hand throughout my training in the Marine Corps, it is very effective not only in learning but also in engaging the learner.  As recruits and as Marines, we tended to pay closer attention when we knew that mastery of a task meant "free" time of sorts.  The Corps gave river banks to learning throughout its curricula, a concept I am trying to incorporate into my company's philosophy as we embark on our own e-learning/e-communications implementation. 

        Our Operations and Training organizations see the value of providing guidelines, or river banks, rather than detailed processes for mastery of our content.  It allows the restaurants to be more responsive to learning needs and allows the managers to implement learning in ways that meet their timing, human resource and other needs.  For all of our learning programs, there will be various options available for learners to demonstrate comprehension and mastery.  Once they do, they can move on.  This reduces cost in terms of labor hours, improves efficiency, and, as already mentioned, increases flexibility exponentially.  This is especially true when learners come to us from our competitors' employment and already have a good understanding of operations, safety, service and other crucial topics.” Adam P Horbett, Burger King

 

“I think that there are a number of issues to consider here.

*          The learning environment must be such that those who remain (and in particular the last person) do not see themselves as "failing" in any way, but rather as just learning at a different pace etc.

*          For some "hard" skills, leaving once mastery is achieved would seem to be a reasonable way of maximizing the value of both the trainer's time and that of the learners. I think that whatever method is used to assess mastery must be robust enough to ensure true learning before departure.

Where "soft" skills are taught and in particular where experiential learning is employed, learners often acquire skills and knowledge from more able colleagues as they work together and so a valuable source of learning may be lost if some leave along the way.” Alec Brown, Tombo Development Limited

 

 “Novel idea, but it is rational. The opportunity to 'test-out' at certain intervals should be an option for classes of 1.5 days or more.

People should be able "suffer" through a one-day'er.

The  "downsides" I can see:

*          The reactions or feelings of the people "left behind". Would they feel like candidates for a dunce-cap?

Ideally, the audience would be around the same experience or level, but that's not the 'norm'

*          The mental state-of-mind of those who tried the 'early-out', but failed. Are they in ANY mood to learn at that point ?

Upside: Those that pass the 'early-out' could be given the opportunity to mentor the remaining students, assist the instructor, or even lead remaining portions of the class!

They become the 'Go-To' people during and after the class.

Probably more 'mine-fields' than 'morning-glories', in trying early-outs, but needs to be considered” Jim Taite, CPMS

 

 “At first I was like "are you kidding?" then as I finished reading through your note and Army example, I thought this makes sense. My only concern would be how the participants who are left until the end might feel and could this jeopardize their learning? In other words if I had to stay until the very end either because I was not as quick a learner or had not yet mastered the content would I feel frustrated or take a "why bother?" attitude? In the classroom I think this model would not be as effective. However with an online class (asynchronous or synchronous) this model makes sense and would be an interesting one to test, especially in the US (since we are an individualistic { Hawthorne} and competitive culture). In the online scenario I do think it makes sense and would effectively focus the energy of the instructor on those needing coaching - as long as the facilitator does not form a bias towards those who are still "left till the end".” Kim Ziprik, The IQ Business Group, Inc.

 

“The concept of demonstrating mastery is the goal--or eliciting a change in behavior. So if the training is not dependent on group interaction then letting students "graduate early" seems prudent. The material and skill check need to be aligned so that some element of key learning is not missed with early test-out.” Frederick T. Mertens, Boeing

 

“I have used the peel off methodology in high school when I taught CISCO router programming and MCSE courseware. It worked well, and it did allow me to focus on those students who needed additional help... However, given the fact that this was a high school setting, there were challenges with what to do with them since they had to remain in the classroom.” Catherine Walton, Microsoft

 

 

 

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2